Twice as nice?

November 17, 2017

There is a wrinkle of worry spreading across my forehead as I study my face: the freckles dusting my nose, the dark half moons under my amber eyes, the dimple on my left cheek. All these things make me- well me. And yet, as I reach out to touch my reflection in the mirror, instead of glass I feel the warmth of human touch meet my fingers. The girl I study is not my mirror image. She is my clone.

No, this is not a horror story. It is a very probable reality. According to the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), “the term cloning describes a number of different processes that can be used to produce genetically-identical copies of a biological entity.” To me, reproductive cloning, in which the entire organism is cloned, poses the most imminent threat to society. The vague effects of cloning combined with its ethical implications of manufacturing life, deem it necessary to control advancements in the field. 

To fully comprehend the impact of an engineered society, imagine a world in which 1,000 people have Zac Efron as their father. For some, this would be a fulfillment of their wildest romantic fantasies. For me, it is a cloning nightmare. The New York Times predicts that this may become possible in about 10 to 20 years. Scientists could take the DNA of human skin cells and put this DNA into an egg cell, which could then be fertilized by a sperm cell, according to the NHGRI . This means that all people would need to do is obtain a skin cell from Zac Efron (which are shed virtually everywhere we go) and BOOM, little Efrons everywhere.

However, the problem lies not only with the ethics of the scientists performing the “experiment,” but with the clones themselves. History has shown that sometimes Mother Nature doesn’t like to be messed with.

Living for just six years half the average life expectancy of a sheep Dolly was the first mammal to be cloned from an adult cell, according to NHGRI. When scientists clone an animal from an adult cell, the tips of chromosomes are already “old,” or shorter, so in essence, the clone is already born with an age.

With this in mind, why should we try to create humans out of preexisting DNA? The NHGRI also adds that Dolly was the only cloned embryo out of 277 to live past birth. Thus, it is unconscionable to create a person a living, feeling, thinking being without knowing if they will be healthy, able to function or live a normal life. Because attheendoftheday,a life is a life and has value, even a cloned one. Until scientists can eliminate the uncertainty surrounding the results of a human cloning, attempts at trying to do so should be halted.

In addition, being able to mass produce people with at least half of the same DNA mocks the miracle of life and the uniqueness of the individual. Zac Efron’s eyes would be less attractive and special if 1,000 other people, or clones, had the same exact ones. While this is an extreme example, the same thought process applies to a more common situation.

Every person has their quirks, little things that separate one person from the next. My grandfather was one-of- a-kind, to say the least. Besides being absolutely brilliant, he loved vanilla milkshakes from McDonald’s, Saturday morning comics and jeopardy. When he died, I was devastated. In times of loss, many argue that cloning could bring back the people we’ve lost, the people we’ve loved the most. However, personality is not entirely genetic; it is also largely influenced by our environment and to me, God. Yes, a clone of my grandfather would look just like him, but it wouldn’t be him.

With our hands touching, my clone and I study each other. As I look into her empty eyes, I don’t see myself anymore; I see a stranger. Yes, she has my wiry brown hair, but she doesn’t have my laugh when I see a funny commerical , or my love of honey roasted peanuts. Because she isn’t me. And she never will be.

Please reload


Print Editions

Online Editions

Please reload


Please reload

Orange Media publications are official student-produced mediums of news and information published by the Journalism students of Olentangy Orange High School. The publications have been established as a designated public forum for student journalists to inform, educate and entertain readers as well as for the discussion of issues of concern to their audience. They  will not be reviewed or restrained by school officials, adults or sources prior to publication.

The content of the publications is determined by and reflects only the views of the student staff and not school officials or the school itself. They will not publish any material, determined by the staff or adviser, that is libelous, obscene or disruptive to the school day.

The advisers are Kari Phillips and Brian Nicola. Readers may respond to the publications through Letters to the Editor. Letters may be mailed, e-mailed to or dropped off to room 2223. The staff asks that submissions be 300 words or less and contain the author’s name and signature. Editors reserve the right to edit or withhold publication of letters.

The publications strive to uphold the Canons of Professional Journalism, which includes accuracy, impartiality, etc. Therefore, major errors will be corrected in the next issue. Distinction will be marked between news and opinion stories.

This site was designed with the
website builder. Create your website today.
Start Now